[Grovenet] God forbid there should be a Freudian slip

[Geri]

Why shouldn't women have the choice, under medical
guidelines and care, to go either the prescription or
surgical route?


Geri

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steven" <NoSpam03 at comcast.net>
To: "Forest Grove local interests list" <grovenet at rdrop.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 9:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Grovenet] God forbid there should be a Freudian slip


> So we should make an abortion something you need a prescription for?
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: grovenet-bounces at rdrop.com [mailto:grovenet-bounces at rdrop.com]On
>> Behalf Of Geri
>> Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 8:42 AM
>> To: Forest Grove local interests list
>> Subject: Re: [Grovenet] God forbid there should be a Freudian slip
>> 
>> 
>> Well, we already do have limits on when abortion may
>> take place, and already have legal definitions of murder.
>> 
>> RU486 is by prescription only, so the person would have
>> to be approved for it through their doctor, which makes
>> it unlikely (at least, less likely) that it is birth-control-
>> by-abortion.  My understanding is that for women who
>> qualify medically, it can replace a surgical abortion.
>> 
>> I do hope it remains a prescription, though.
>> 
>> > 
> _______________________________________________
> GroveNet mailing list
> GroveNet at rdrop.com
> http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/grovenet
>