[Grovenet] ear mark this!

Katie Allnutt allnutt at verizon.net
Wed Feb 13 15:29:56 PST 2008


If you are truly fluent in both Portugese and Dutch then I tip my hat  
to you.
But every election that I have participated in and everytime I have  
gone to renew my driver's license it has been in English for me.   
Have they not already been in English for you?

Katie

On Feb 13, 2008, at 12:48 PM, Steven wrote:

> Een enkel voorbeeld van wat zonder een gemeenschappelijke taal  
> gebeurt. Wie
> het allen kan begrijpen. Laat zo een officiele taal hebben die het
> overheidsgebruik voor verkiezingen, bestuurders en al dat  
> vergunning geeft.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: grovenet-bounces at rdrop.com [mailto:grovenet-bounces at rdrop.com]On
> Behalf Of Walt Wentz
> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 10:31 PM
> To: Forest Grove local interests list
> Subject: Re: [Grovenet] ear mark this!
>
>
> Vas ist dos? Haben sie kein Englisch? Ich verstehe sie nicht.
> Sprechen sie auf Englisch, bitte!
>
>> Baste-o dizer que eu posso concordar com o David e o Walter com esta
> edicao.
>> Contudo eu discordei em muitos topicos. Mas se voce nao pudesse
> compreender
>> que isto voce nunca saberia aquele, voce? Assim nao provando seu  
>> proprio
>> ponto.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: grovenet-bounces at rdrop.com [mailto:grovenet- 
>> bounces at rdrop.com]On
>> Behalf Of Jeff Howden
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 6:26 PM
>> To: 'Forest Grove local interests list'
>> Subject: Re: [Grovenet] ear mark this!
>>
>>
>> David,
>>
>>> <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
>>>  From: David Morelli [mailto:jo.david at verizon.net]
>>>
>>>> We've made it over 200 years without an official
>>>> language.  What makes you think that having one now
>>>> will change anything?
>>>>
>>>> Personally, I see no reason for an official language.
>>>
>>>  I would suggest that the laws that are written, and the
>>>  decisions of our courts are easier to understand and
>>>  (if it ever possible) easier to keep consistent if they
>>>  don't have the added confusion of differing linguistics.
>>> <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
>>
>> That proves my point, if anything.  We've made it this far (200+  
>> years)
>> without an official language for drafting laws in, operating our  
>> courts
>> in,
>> etc., yet somehow we still manage to get those things done.  I  
>> *really*
>> don't see how mandating an official language is going to add anything
>> positive to what seems to already just "work" (as much as our justice
>> system
>> actually works).
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GroveNet mailing list
>> GroveNet at rdrop.com
>> http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/grovenet
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GroveNet mailing list
>> GroveNet at rdrop.com
>> http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/grovenet
>
> _______________________________________________
> GroveNet mailing list
> GroveNet at rdrop.com
> http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/grovenet
>
> _______________________________________________
> GroveNet mailing list
> GroveNet at rdrop.com
> http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/grovenet



More information about the GroveNet mailing list