[Grovenet] A new look at an old Constitutional Amendment

[Allen Warren]

Bob, wrt me, you're being WAY too kind.

I don't label myself as a member of any particular political party.  In the past I voted for Ronald Reagan.  Most recently I've been leaning towards Democratic candidates.  But again, I'm not registered with any one party.

>From what I've read over the years here on Grovenet, my perception is we're not political party diverse, i.e. Grovenet has a much higher percentage of folks who either ARE Democrats or align themselves more closely to the Democratic party.

And as far as my responses potentially being intellectual, I *try* to only respond when I believe I can do so with some level of intelligence.  I try to follow the old adage of, "Better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt."  I *HATE* it when I remove all doubt!  :-)

 
Allen Warren



________________________________
From: Bob Browning <rab at jurislex.com>
To: Forest Grove local interests list <grovenet at rdrop.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 11:11:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Grovenet] A new look at an old Constitutional Amendment

And thus, with David and Katie and Allen's comments, I
once again make my observation that the intellectual level of G'net has
got to be well above average!! But, then, maybe we have scared all the
Rs away and that has skewed the listserv toward a higher level of
intelligence!!

bob "who, me??" browning
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Allen Warren wrote: 
The formula developed by Li was both good and bad. <snip>

Allen Warren
______________________________
From: Katie Allnutt <allnutt at verizon.net>
To: Forest Grove local interests list <grovenet at rdrop.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 7:23:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Grovenet] A new look at an old Constitutional Amendment

Good points. I thought the article also did a good job of explaining  
that too many managers believed that the formula by itself made up  
for any variations in those same underlying assumptions.  <snip>

Thanks for reading it.

Katie

On Feb 24, 2009, at 9:56 PM, David Morelli wrote:
The underlying assumption of the formula is that the "the market
knows the value of the product and the market price will reflect the
risk".  <snip>

Caution can be a useful practice.

David