[Grovenet] What the cluck?
Glenn Berkheimer
braketimecoffee at hotmail.com
Mon Jun 29 12:39:30 PDT 2009
Can one of please run for City Council so maybe we have a chance to have someone on it that is not a politician or one that wants to be one. To me they all need to be impeached.
Just a suggestion./
> From: NoSpam03 at comcast.net
> To: grovenet at rdrop.com
> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:10:41 -0700
> Subject: Re: [Grovenet] What the cluck?
>
> The tyrant in the grove.
>
> Best description since the time he tried to tax the property of businesses
> except his own.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: grovenet-bounces at rdrop.com [mailto:grovenet-bounces at rdrop.com]On
> Behalf Of mark oberzil
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 10:56 PM
> To: Forest Grove local interests list
> Subject: [Grovenet] What the cluck?
>
> Lemme see if I got this straight (I've been out of town):
>
> Put up a giant flag in a public place -no permit required.
>
> Put a few pullets out of sight on your own property, and here comes the
> government with its hand out?
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> --- On Wed, 6/10/09, Allen Warren <osubuckeye59 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: Allen Warren <osubuckeye59 at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [Grovenet] Chicken Amendment
> To: "Forest Grove local interests list" <grovenet at rdrop.com>
> Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2009, 5:39 PM
>
>
> It's interesting how the Council is reconsidering requiring a Residential
> Permit, especially since there are already homeowners within city limits
> raising chickens today. But since most of these homeowners don't have
> roosters, neighbors don't readily notice chickens in the vicinity.
>
> All pets are "supposed" to be licensed, but truth is there is some
> percentage of pet owners who never license their pets, and this becomes a
> problem when said pets are found wandering the streets or captured as a
> result of the pet attacking another pet/person or the pet being a
> nuisance. With chickens, there's really no incentive for a homeowner to
> obtain a permit for the chickens and, again, if the chickens are
> unnoticeable/undetected, there will be some homeowners who simply
> forgo the cost of obtaining a permit. Plus with chickens, homeowners
> realize they need to do everything possible to keep them caged/restricted
> more so to do with preventing the likes of raccoons from getting in and
> eating the chickens.
>
> I truly don't understand the logic of Residential Permits for chickens,
> other than the City would then know who has/has not chickens. But maybe
> the only logic is to get additional monies, however small they be, for the
> city coffers. And no, we don't own any chickens. :-)
>
> Maybe I'll show up at the next meeting to find out details.
>
> Question: who manages Council meetings? Sets & publishes the agendas?
> Publishes minutes?
>
> Allen Warren
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Martha Khoury <khourym at verizon.net>
> To: Forest Grove local interests list <grovenet at rdrop.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 8:21:57 AM
> Subject: [Grovenet] Chicken Amendment
>
> WHAT??!!
>
> Did I hear you say they are back to permits for the residential zone?
>
> Didn't they hear me say... "minimal bureaucracy?"
>
> Did someone mention that the staff had worked through that idea
> already and REJECTED it?
>
> I love TriMet, but that guy coming threw us off schedule so badly that
> I missed all the important stuff.
> And the mayor talks way too much.
>
> --Martha K.
>
>
>
> On Jun 9, 2009, at 10:08 PM, David Morelli wrote:
>
> > The chicken legislation is not an "emergency" so there will be two
> > public readings before the vote. The first reading was Monday and
> > the next reading was scheduled, likely for the next regular council
> > meeting. Because there was a change to the area impacted by the
> > proposed permit process that was not in the originally published
> > announcement, they have extended the testimony period for that single
> > item. People may provide written comment on the expansion of the
> > area subject to permits from the Commercial Zone to both the
> > Commercial Zone and the Single Family Residence Zone. There may also
> > be public testimony on that single item at the next hearing on the
> > legislation.
> >
> > David
> >
> > On Jun 9, 2009, at 2:54 PM, Bob Browning wrote:
> >
> >>
> _______________________________________________
> GroveNet mailing list
> GroveNet at rdrop.com
> http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/grovenet
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GroveNet mailing list
> GroveNet at rdrop.com
> http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/grovenet
> _______________________________________________
> GroveNet mailing list
> GroveNet at rdrop.com
> http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/grovenet
>
> _______________________________________________
> GroveNet mailing list
> GroveNet at rdrop.com
> http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/grovenet
_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live™ SkyDrive™: Get 25 GB of free online storage.
http://windowslive.com/online/skydrive?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_SD_25GB_062009
More information about the GroveNet
mailing list