[Grovenet] mean people still suck
jo.david
jo.david at verizon.net
Fri Mar 13 00:53:33 PDT 2009
On Mar 12, 2009, at 1:38 PM, Zip Digity wrote:
> The question here is not how or why someone is the way they are; it
> is easy to assume- that's one of the problems. Everything happens
> for a reason.
> And there is no reason not to treat people how you want to be treated.
Yes, "Do unto others as you would have them, do unto you" is the
Golden rule.
The Gold Rule, by contrast, is "Do unto others as you please, because
those with the gold make the rules."
A college professor offered the Platinum Rule: Do unto others as they
would have you do unto them."
It presupposes that people are different, and what I may enjoy may
cause you grief. Before we can "do unto others", we will need to
gain some understanding of how they want to be treated. Which is
significantly more difficult than the Golden Rule.
As we see people, we can and should see the similarities. We can
also acknowledge that there are important differences, even when
dealing with those in our community without a permanent address.
Some are homeless, others displaced, a few may be fugitives, while
others are wanderers. There may be violent felons, gypsies and
religious missionaries in the mix. Our response may be to trust them
all, to fear them all, or somewhere in the middle. And I expect that
they carry a trust or distrust toward each of us based upon their
prior experiences inside and outside of our community.
If you have twenty of these humans in a group, you may have twenty
different stories and twenty different situations asking for a
response. It may be appropriate to give an apple or candy bar to
someone. It may be appropriate to escort another out of town. We do
hire and hopefully train people to assist us in separating the needy
from the sinister. The professionals we hire are paid by our taxes.
Do we want to assist the displaced and homeless? Do we want to
incarcerate the thieves, predators and charlatans? Or do we want to
turn our back on all of them? That is a large scale political question.
I personally don't want thieves running loose in my neighborhood
while I am away from home. I don't want predators targeting children
of our community. I don't want charlatans preying on the resources
of the poorly informed.
And, I do want to make efforts to keep the displaced and homeless
from choosing to become thieves or charlatans. If they are going to
make good choices, than they need to have some options that they and
we can agree are "good". It makes no sense to decry that someone
made a "bad choice" unless we know that they had a good option
available to them.
We can choose to do this for religious reasons. Or we can do it for
self preservation.
More information about the GroveNet
mailing list