[Grovenet] Sensitive data missing from National Archives - MSNBC Articles

Geri g-g-steele at comcast.net
Wed May 20 13:56:21 PDT 2009


"So, of course it is best to blame Clinton, who wasn't there for eight years."
  
    That's to be expected, isn't it?  ;-)
      
        Geri

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Morelli" <jo.david at verizon.net>
To: "Forest Grove local interests list" <grovenet at rdrop.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Grovenet] Sensitive data missing from National Archives - MSNBC Articles


> <quote>
> The drive is missing from the Archives facility in College Park, Md.,  
> a Washington suburb. The drive was lost between October 2008 and  
> March 2009 and contained 1 terabyte of data - enough material to fill  
> millions of books.
> 
> A Republican committee aide who was at the inspector general's  
> briefing said the Archives had been converting the Clinton  
> administration information to a digital records system when the hard  
> drive went missing.
> 
> </quote>
> 
> October-January was the Bush Administration wasn't it?  That would be  
> a 80% chance that Republicans were in charge at the time.  So, of  
> course it is best to blame Clinton, who wasn't there for eight years.
> 
> David
> 
> On May 20, 2009, at 8:36 AM, Alan Domenghini aka an OleHoss wrote:
> 
>> I wonder which Clinton had a hand in this?
>>
>> http://news.mobile.msn.com/en-us/articles.aspx? 
>> afid=1&aid=30845203&pg1=2501
>>
>> http://news.mobile.msn.com/en-us/articles.aspx?afid=1&aid=30845203
>> _______________________________________________
>> GroveNet mailing list
>> GroveNet at rdrop.com
>> http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/grovenet
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GroveNet mailing list
> GroveNet at rdrop.com
> http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/grovenet
>



More information about the GroveNet mailing list