[Oeva-list] Fuel Image

[Marshall, Wendy]

I didn't get the image regarding the screening, or even a spot that
looked like the image should have been there.

wendy

-----Original Message-----
From: oeva-list-bounces at oeva.org [mailto:oeva-list-bounces at oeva.org] On
Behalf Of oeva-list-request at oeva.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 12:00 PM
To: oeva-list at oeva.org
Subject: Oeva-list Digest, Vol 60, Issue 29

Send Oeva-list mailing list submissions to
	oeva-list at oeva.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/oeva-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	oeva-list-request at oeva.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
	oeva-list-owner at oeva.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of Oeva-list digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Administrivia: Message size query (Alan Batie)
   2. Re: Administrivia: Message size query (Steve's Account)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:02:54 -0700
From: Alan Batie <alan at batie.org>
Subject: [Oeva-list] Administrivia: Message size query
To: OEVA <oeva-list at oeva.org>
Message-ID: <4906C72E.6020603 at batie.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

I little bit of administrivia: I've been letting a few larger messages
through that seemed relevant, but the biofuel film message was
borderline.  I went ahead and allowed it because most of the relevant
information was actually in the image, though it's uncertain if any of
us would actually be able to attend.  These sorts of things are usually
more flexible than they let on though.

Anyway, I thought I'd get some guidance from the group on message size;
the list default is 40k, this particular message was 200k.  I'm inclined
to put 100k as the list setting given modern realities.  Anything bigger
should still be sent as a link to the web site instead in most cases,
IMHO, but would like to see what people think...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3263 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20081028/fe6774bd/attachment-0001.bin 

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 07:51:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Steve's Account" <stevel at fern.com>
Subject: Re: [Oeva-list] Administrivia: Message size query
To: Alan Batie <alan at batie.org>
Cc: OEVA <oeva-list at oeva.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0810280749240.18946 at hub.fern.com>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Alan Batie wrote:

> Anyway, I thought I'd get some guidance from the group on message 
> size; the list default is 40k, this particular message was 200k.  I'm 
> inclined to put 100k as the list setting given modern realities.  
> Anything bigger should still be sent as a link to the web site instead

> in most cases, IMHO, but would like to see what people think...

I'd prefer a smaller size and filtering html to just plain text.. You
can always post a url if you want to refer to some html document.

I'm of the "just say no" to html in email school. :-)

Steve


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Oeva-list mailing list
Oeva-list at oeva.org
http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/oeva-list


End of Oeva-list Digest, Vol 60, Issue 29
*****************************************