[Oeva-list] Oregon's new AFTERMARKET bill
jrab at e-m-w.com
Wed Feb 11 21:09:50 PST 2009
By "dont sell Jack" was shorthand for: I should have said the parts
that are promoted are generally, "Get more horsepower with..." or
"Bigger badder bla bla bla". I'm making a pretty gross stereotype for
that stuff though I'll admit. NEVER have I gone in to get a new oil
filter and been told "This one is going to help your fuel efficiency"
or at Les Schwab, "here's an option: These tires will improve your
MPG" . New brand intake and exhaust? They'll sell the cheaper one, not
the more fuel efficient one. If you are looking for something
specific, then this law as worded isn't going to prevent you from
getting it, but it might encourage aftermarket to provide something
more efficient. If there's a reg to say, you must buy this one because
it will increase efficiency, that's good. Like the feds telling the
auto manufactures the need to put catalytic converters on cars.
Everyone whined about that one, and it cost more, but the air is
cleaner because of it. And people still drive guzzlers.
Reality? The wording is so general that it would take the supreme
court to enforce it. There is nothing that defines restrictions or
prohibitions, or how it would be enforced. It seems pretty much like
legislative pandering to show that they are doing something. I just
read Alan's mail that came after yours and would have to agree with him.
On Feb 11, 2009, at 10:23 AM, D at nil0 wrote:
> I disagree,
> What do you mean that aftermarket do not sell Jack that is fuel
> OEM cars have restrictions that are there just because they need to
> satisfy a wide variety of customers. Example of this is noise levels
> and ride quality (from tires, exhaust, air intake etc)
> Some customers are willing to sacrifice some of that comfort for
> practicability. Most would do it themselves and some of us already
> do it.
> The car would improve a few miles per gallon if you install a good
> brand intake and exhaust. There are a few other modifications you
> can do in addition to that, and there are a few cars that the
> improvement would be much better than others.
> For another example, do you know that it is illegal to modify a car
> to E85? without entering in a debate if it is green or not, the way
> the law stands now, it is not legal. I would love to be able to have
> a renewable fuel and not having to pay the other countries as much
> as we do now while at the same time reducing the carbon footprint.
> (Not counting the extra horsepower I will have.)
> Well I guess everyone have their own opinions.
> For me, this regulation will do more harm than good.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: John Benson
> To: Kristen Hall-Geisler
> Cc: OEVA
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 9:33 AM
> Subject: Re: [Oeva-list] Oregon's new AFTERMARKET bill
> I'm not sure what the problem is really either?
> (d) Restrictions and prohibitions on the sale and distribution
> of after-market motor vehicle parts, including but not limited to
> tires, if alternatives are available that decrease greenhouse gas
> emissions from motor vehicles;
> That's all is says about aftermarket.
> Sounds like a good thing. If there are alternatives, aftermarkets
> need to provide them. Does Les Schwab sell LRR tires as a first
> choice? Not generally. Sorta like saying pharmacies need to sell
> generics. Well, yeah, except the generics are the fuel efficient
> options. Most of the time, autoparts stores don't sell Jack that's
> fuel efficient, except for garbage "magic solutions" and fuel
> additives. Nothing in this about having to sell GM products or non-
> aftermarket products as far as I read it, but I'm not a lawyer.
> Potentially, that means maybe autoparts stores would have to sell
> Zilla's (if they were manufactured again)? Yahoo!
> On Feb 10, 2009, at 9:34 PM, Kristen Hall-Geisler wrote:
>> I'm not sure why EVers would want to stop this; here's the text of
>> the bill: http://landru.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measures/hb2100.dir/hb2186.intro.html
>> Maybe I've missed a subtlety you guys have picked up on. - khg
>> Kristen Hall-Geisler
>> freelance writer | Portland, Oregon
>> 503.975.0306 | kristenhallgeisler.com
>> From: D at nil0
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 5:57 PM
>> To: oeva-list at oeva.org
>> Subject: [Oeva-list] Oregon's new AFTERMARKET bill
>> We need to stop this. As a new bill is soon to be introduced.
>> We need all to send emails and letters as this could be the end of
>> the aftermarked parts market.
>> as you said even if you aren't from Oregon, please send an e-mail
>> anyways to help get this bill to fail.
>> Your state could be next!!!!
>> URGENT LEGISLATIVE ALERT
>> Oregon Introduces Bill to Prohibit Sale of Aftermarket Parts
>> At the request of Governor Theodore Kulongoski, the Oregon Speaker
>> of the House has introduced legislation (H.B. 2186) to prohibit the
>> sale and distribution of aftermarket motor vehicle parts if
>> alternatives are available that “decrease greenhouse gas emissions
>> from motor vehicles.” The bill is primarily focused on aftermarket
>> tires and would authorize the Environmental Quality Commission to
>> implement enforcement regulations, likely based on a rolling
>> resistance calculation.
>> We Urge You to Contact Oregon Speaker of the House Dave Hunt and
>> Members of the Environment and Water Committee (Contact Information
>> Below) Immediately to Request Their Opposition to H.B. 2186
>> H.B. 2186 would regulate vehicle fuel economy, an authority
>> reserved to the federal government.
>> H.B. 2186 could ban tires that may have improved performance,
>> handling or appearance features, based solely on a rolling
>> resistance rating. In addition, this program could easily distract
>> consumers from focusing on more important safety issues such as
>> tire inflation and overloading of vehicles.
>> H.B. 2186 would force consumers to purchase only original equipment
>> manufacturer (OEM) tires because the program essentially exempts
>> OEM-selected tires and unfairly implies that they are superior to
>> aftermarket products.
>> H.B. 2186 could prohibit aftermarket parts designed to either
>> personalize or optimize specific vehicle performance attributes
>> including handling, towing, suspension, fuel economy, etc.
>> H.B. 2186 provides broad authority to government regulators and
>> could limit a range of aftermarket parts currently available to
>> consumers based on the subjective determination of government
>> DON’T DELAY! Please contact Oregon Speaker Dave Hunt and the House
>> Environment and Water Committee immediately to urge his opposition
>> to H.B. 2186.
>> Oregon House Speaker Dave Hunt
>> Phone: 503/986-1440
>> Email: rep.davehunt at state.or.us
>> Oregon House Environment and Water Committee
>> Representative Ben Cannon – Chair
>> Phone: 503/986-1446
>> Email: rep.bencannon at state.or.us
>> Representative Jules Bailey
>> Phone: 503/986-1442
>> Email: rep.juleskopelbailey at state.or.us
>> Representative Phil Barnhart
>> Phone: 503/986-1411
>> Email: rep.philbarnhart at state.or.us
>> Representative Cliff Bentz
>> Phone: 503/986-1460
>> Email: rep.cliffbentz at state.or.us
>> Representative Deborah Boone
>> Phone: 503/986-1432
>> Email: rep.deborahboone at state.or.us
>> Representative Vic Gilliam
>> Phone: 503/986-1418
>> Email: rep.vicgilliam at state.or.us
>> Representative Bob Jenson
>> Phone: 503/986-1458
>> Email: rep.bobjenson at state.or.us
>> Representative Jefferson Smith
>> Phone: 503/986-1447
>> Email: rep.jeffersonsmith at state.or.us
>> from this web site:
>> Oeva-list mailing list
>> Oeva-list at oeva.org
>> Oeva-list mailing list
>> Oeva-list at oeva.org
> Oeva-list mailing list
> Oeva-list at oeva.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Oeva-list