This site last updated on December 12, 2005
Copyright © 1999/2000/2001/2002/2003/2004/2005/2006 LEATHERSEXFANTASY
The US Government has started to crack down again on "Porn" sites (which, like this one, they consider porn) and many others which reference BDSM (in pictures as well as text).
The 2257 regulations weren't enough to deal with, now they are planning new obscenity prosecutions as well.
THIS IS WHY I HAVE MADE THE DECISION TO TAKE DOWN MY WEBSITE WHILE THIS IS SORTED OUT IN THE COURTS.
YOU STILL CAN VIEW MY PROFILE (for free) AND IF YOU ARE A PREMIUM MEMBER OF SLAVE4MASTER (or any of the other RECON sites),
YOU CAN ALSO VIEW MY GALLERY OF PHOTOS TAKEN OF MY SCENES IN MY PLAYROOM, JUST CLICK BELOW.
Following is the latest on what the Justice Dept. here in the U.S. is wasting their time on.
As to the attack on S & M activity as well There are a lot of "gray" areas with this attack by our Government, but this Republican Justice Dept. is out of control. As far as I'm concerned...Bondage pictures won't fall into their definition of S & M behavior. I'm may be being naive on that one. They are also targeting even "Text" in stories...so those also have come down as well.
You know I don't want to do this, but it is the only way that I feel I will be able to survive until some rational decisions are made.
Following is a "October 20, 2005 story in which Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has announced that his office will specifically target "bestiality, urination, defecation, as well as sadistic and masochistic behavior" in pursuing new obscenity prosecutions. The Department of Justice began recruiting in late July for a new anti-obscenity squad to pursue obscenity prosecutions, and the FBI announced in September that it was forming an anti-obscenity task force to crack down on pornography.
Any website that has content containing "bestiality, urination, defecation, as well as sadistic and masochistic behavior" should be forewarned that prosecution is possible. Additionally, Federal sentencing guidelines state that any obscenity- related punishment should be "enhanced for sadomasochistic material."
Forty people and businesses have been convicted of obscenity since 2001, and 20
additional indictments are pending according to Andrew Oosterbaan, chief of the
Justice Department's child exploitation and obscenity section. There were only four
obscenity prosecutions during the eight years of the Clinton administration.
Though adult content is, in theory, protected by the First Amendment, only a jury
can determine if a work is obscene or not under the subjective set of standards
that vary from one community to the next established in the 1973 Supreme Court
ruling, Miller v. California.
Text is not inherently more protected than images when it comes to obscenity
charges. The erotic fiction website Red Rose Stories is facing obscenity charges
after federal agents raided the owner's home on October 3rd, taking computer
equipment and diskettes that contained all of their files and site information.
The Department of Justice is clearly hoping that websites will self-censor or
remove their content entirely. Midori, a fetish model and SM educator who teaches
classes on bondage, has removed her website, BeautyBound.com, citing fear of
obscenity prosecution. The owner of three SM websites, known as GrandPa DeSade,
removed his websites from the Internet. SuicideGirls.com also announced they are
self-censoring their materials over concerns about a possible obscenity crackdown.
Recent prosecutions of obscenity on websites include: A former police officer in
Lakeland, Florida, was arrested on October 7th on over 300 obscenity-related
charges for the sexual content posted on his website. The same day, webmaster Chris
Wilson, owner of amateur website NowThatsFuckedUp.com, was raided on charges of
obscenity by a local Sheriffs office.
"I think it's crucial for us to stand up for consensual sadomasochism and other alternative sexual practices," says Barbara Nitke, fetish photographer. "This is a battle worth fighting, and I hope everyone who can will just censor out the most provocative material from their websites, but keep them up. I also appeal to the lawyers in our community to help us find ways to keep people's websites up."
Barbara Nitke and the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom (NCSF) have proactively challenged federal obscenity laws as applied to the Internet, arguing that obscenity laws based on "local community standards" are too vague and their existence burdens protected speech, resulting in self-censorship due to the fear of prosecution. A district court three-judge panel in New York ruled that while Nitke and the NCSF members were at risk, more proof was needed that obscenity laws cause otherwise protected speech to be restrained through acts of self-censorship. The case is currently on appeal to the United States Supreme Court.
"The effect of silencing alternative lifestyle speech was exactly why we brought
the lawsuit," says attorney John Wirenius, lead counsel for NCSF. "The self-
censorship we are seeing underscores the importance of supporting our ongoing